Editor’s note: This Reader Forum article was written and submitted by Prue Beidler of Lake Forest. It represents the writer’s opinions and not necessarily those of GazeboNews. We encourage you to respond to this, but please include your full name per the GazeboNews comments policy on Reader Forums.
By Prue Beidler of Lake Forest
Fifteen years ago when I was asked to join Crissy Cherry as co-president of Market Square 2000 I agreed with enthusiasm. This seemed a fitting opportunity to express my appreciation to the community in which my husband Frank and I had raised our three children. Crissy and I undertook the leadership of the Market Square 2000 board after the City Council accepted Lake Forest Garden Club’s gift of a rehabilitation plan requested by the City and crafted by nationally acclaimed landscape architect Rodney Robinson.
In the last few years as the Forest Park Project has unfolded I have thought often of that challenging and exciting Market Square 2000 work. The parallels are striking. Both plans were requested by the City for the rehabilitation of iconic and beloved spaces. Both were designed by distinguished and experienced landscape architects. In the case of Forest Park the landscape architect is Stephen Stimson. Both plans were funded by Lake Forest Garden Club and then the projects themselves were “spun off” to become independent 501(c)(3) organizations. Both projects included numerous opportunities for community comment and with both projects the original plans were modified after this input. In both cases, volunteers and City staff worked tirelessly as partners.
Each public-private partnership has its own story line, however, and there are certainly some differences between the two projects. Crissy and I brought experience as volunteers to our leadership and certainly passion for the project itself. But we really had to create, with our board, the model to actually get the work done. The Market Square 2000 public private partnership serves, I believe, as a strong model for the Forest Park Project as it moves forward. It is also enormously important to the current project that Ralph Gesualdo, a former chairman of the Lake Forest Parks and Recreation Board, already knew Forest Park well before he assumed the leadership of the Forest Park Project board and he understood fully the complex issues that go into designing and maintaining all of our City’s parks. This same expertise is reflected in the extraordinary skill sets brought to the Forest Park Project board by its volunteer members.
Another distinct element to the story line for Forest Park is the length of the process to date. I always support including as many views as possible in discussing a space which belongs to all Lake Forest residents. But I also believe that it is time for City commission and Council members to accept the reality that some people will not be supportive of the project no matter how many changes are made or how long public discourse continues. I know the people who feel this way love Lake Forest as much as I do. They may not believe, as I do, that spaces used by humans inevitably need modifications over time. Perhaps they worry that their own cherished experiences in the current park will not be replicated in the rehabilitated space. Yet I believe that we are all assured of continued cherished experiences long into the future because both the City and Forest Park Project board are clearly focused on maintaining Forest Park as a passive park with improved walking spaces and view lines to the lake.
The process has had great integrity, as did the process for rehabilitating Market Square. It is now time to move forward. The work has honored the visions and plans of those associated with Forest Park in earlier times as well as the current needs of the community and likely needs of our residents in the future. I urge the support and encouragement of residents and I urge the endorsement of the plan by both the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council at their upcoming meetings.





